Welcome to About Time

About Time is the national newspaper for Australian prisons and detention facilities

Your browser window currently does not have enough height, or is zoomed in too far to view our website content correctly. Once the window reaches the minimum required height or zoom percentage, the content will display automatically.

Alternatively, you can learn more via the links below.

Donations via GiveNow

Email

Instagram

LinkedIn

ISSUE NO. 8
March 2025
Donate Here

Legal Corner

Legal Q&A – No Body, No Parole

Ethan Cassidy

Hi there, thank you for your question.  This information comes from the NSW State Parole Authority:

Under the No Body, No Parole legislation, the NSW Commissioner of Police must provide the NSW State Parole Authority a written report evaluating an offender’s level of co-operation and assistance in identifying the victim’s body or remains.

The legislation applies retrospectively, i.e. for any parole decision made after October 2022, regardless of when the homicide offence or conviction occurred.

How does this legislation impact parole decisions for offenders convicted of homicide?

Community safety is the Parole Authority’s highest priority when making decisions about releasing inmates on parole.

The Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 states the State Parole Authority must not make a parole order if it is not satisfied that it is in the interest of community safety.

Hi there, thank you for your question.  This information comes from the NSW State Parole Authority:

Under the No Body, No Parole legislation, the NSW Commissioner of Police must provide the NSW State Parole Authority a written report evaluating an offender’s level of co-operation and assistance in identifying the victim’s body or remains.

The legislation applies retrospectively, i.e. for any parole decision made after October 2022, regardless of when the homicide offence or conviction occurred.

How does this legislation impact parole decisions for offenders convicted of homicide?

Community safety is the Parole Authority’s highest priority when making decisions about releasing inmates on parole.

The Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 states the State Parole Authority must not make a parole order if it is not satisfied that it is in the interest of community safety.

Legal Q&A

Do you have a general legal query that you want answered?
Is  there an area of law that you think people inside should know more about? Submit your question in the provided form, and we might publish an answer in the paper.

Submit Your Question

Following the “no body no parole” amendment, the State Parole Authority is required to have regard to the written advice of NSW Police about the offender’s level of cooperation and assistance concerning the location of the victim.

This includes an evaluation of the timeliness of the offender’s cooperation; the truthfulness, completeness and reliability of information or evidence provided and the significance and usefulness of the offender’s cooperation.

Therefore, the Parole Authority cannot make a parole order unless it is satisfied that the offender has cooperated satisfactorily in police investigations or other actions to identify the victim’s location.”

Added by About Time:

Similar laws have been introduced in the Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Victoria and Western Australia.

While intended to provide a sense of closure for the family and friends of victims, critics argue that the legislation has serious repercussions for people who are wrongfully convicted. In late 2024, the Bridge of Hope Innocence Project wrote an open letter to the NSW Attorney General, signed by over 100 people, arguing that the law doesn’t effectively incentivise cooperation but instead traps wrongfully convicted individuals in prison, even if they pose minimal risk to society. One high profile example is Lindy Chamberlain-Creighton, who served three years in prison for the murder of her daughter, Azaria. Chamberlain-Creighton was later pardoned when new evidence was found indicating she was innocent.

Following the “no body no parole” amendment, the State Parole Authority is required to have regard to the written advice of NSW Police about the offender’s level of cooperation and assistance concerning the location of the victim.

This includes an evaluation of the timeliness of the offender’s cooperation; the truthfulness, completeness and reliability of information or evidence provided and the significance and usefulness of the offender’s cooperation.

Therefore, the Parole Authority cannot make a parole order unless it is satisfied that the offender has cooperated satisfactorily in police investigations or other actions to identify the victim’s location.”

Added by About Time:

Similar laws have been introduced in the Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Victoria and Western Australia.

While intended to provide a sense of closure for the family and friends of victims, critics argue that the legislation has serious repercussions for people who are wrongfully convicted. In late 2024, the Bridge of Hope Innocence Project wrote an open letter to the NSW Attorney General, signed by over 100 people, arguing that the law doesn’t effectively incentivise cooperation but instead traps wrongfully convicted individuals in prison, even if they pose minimal risk to society. One high profile example is Lindy Chamberlain-Creighton, who served three years in prison for the murder of her daughter, Azaria. Chamberlain-Creighton was later pardoned when new evidence was found indicating she was innocent.

Legal Q&A

Legal Q&A

Legal Q&A

Anonymous
Anonymous

If you are charged with breaking a rule in prison, this can result in disciplinary action, in addition to potential criminal charges.

Legal Corner

ISSUE NO. 14

2 MIN READ

What Happens to Your Debts While You’re Inside?

What Happens to Your Debts While You’re Inside?

What Happens to Your Debts While You’re Inside?

By Prisoner Legal Service Queensland
By Prisoner Legal Service Queensland

Generally, debts can be put into two categories. First, there are private debts (e.g. from a bank, a landlord, a car dealer, or ‘Afterpay’). Second, there are debts owed to the State (e.g. unpaid fines).

Legal Corner

ISSUE NO. 20

2 MIN READ

Do You Have a Right to Legal Representation?

Do You Have a Right to Legal Representation?

Do You Have a Right to Legal Representation?

By Daniel Vansetten
By Daniel Vansetten

If you believe your right to a fair trial has not been provided, you should seek advice from a lawyer.

Legal Corner

ISSUE NO. 7

5 MIN READ

Bail: Common Questions

Bail: Common Questions

Bail: Common Questions

By Meg Tait and About Time (with help from Uther Webster & Evans Solicitors and Daniel Vansetten)
By Meg Tait and About Time (with help from Uther Webster & Evans Solicitors and Daniel Vansetten)

Bail is a promise you can make that you will return to court. It means you can stay in the community (instead of jail) until your legal matters finish. If you are being held in custody and you haven’t been found guilty, you may be able to apply for bail.

Legal Corner

ISSUE NO. 3

15 MIN READ

What Happens to Your Debts While You’re Inside?

By Prisoner Legal Service Queensland

Generally, debts can be put into two categories. First, there are private debts (e.g. from a bank, a landlord, a car dealer, or ‘Afterpay’). Second, there are debts owed to the State (e.g. unpaid fines).

Legal Corner

ISSUE NO. 20

2 MIN READ

Confusing Decision Made About You? Maybe FOI Can Help

By Dan Vansetten

The concern for those who are subjected to government decisions is that they often do not get to see the integrity of the information which was considered by the decision-maker and don’t get to check if it’s correct.

Legal Corner

ISSUE NO. 20

3 MIN READ

Practical Self-Advocacy Tips: Part 1 – Using Prison Policies

By Daniel Vansetten

One of the most important aspects of self-advocacy in prison is to understand the rights of prisoners and the limitations of power of prison authorities.

Legal Corner

ISSUE NO. 19

2 MIN READ

Be Prepared: New Restrictions on Mobile Phones in Immigration Detention

By Josephine Langbien

New laws mean that immigration detention officers can now confiscate things like mobile phones, iPads and laptops, which were previously allowed in detention centres. If you’re facing time in immigration detention at the end of your sentence, this article gives some practical tips to prepare for the new rules before you go.

Legal Corner

ISSUE NO. 19

3 MIN READ